![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Drawing. The sense of the word can be academic, dry, somehow small. But the reality is quite different. Drawings these days are often large, measured in feet not inches. They can be produced with pencil or charcoal or cut paper or fat brushes and ink. They represent the process requiring the most finely tuned connection between eye and hand.I had always used drawing as a means of note-taking or engineering, never as a means of expression. Over time, marks have appeared in my sculptural work, sometimes organizing themselves into what might be called a drawing. If you had asked me if I drew, however, I would demur, saying, "No, not really."
But last year, I rediscovered the pure joy of drawing, the immediacy of being able to respond to the world in a direct and dynamic way. A couple of short classes and a residency in France gave me the time to develop skills and to make them my own.
"Yes, I draw," is what I would say now.
Of course, I will continue to make basket pieces as well. It is my hope that drawing will add to an already rich set of possibilities for the type of work I have been doing for thirty years, as well as providing a new and exciting direction.
- Lissa Hunter 2010
To see more drawings, click on "Old Friends" in the Portfolio Section.
ART REVIEWOLD FRIENDS/NEW WORK Tom Hall and Lissa Hunter "In the Arts: Masters of darkness deliver shades of brilliance," by Phillip Isaacson The Portland Press Herald September 19, 2010
The title to the show notwithstanding -- "Old Friends/New Work" --Tom Hall and Lissa Hunter struck me as an odd combination. Hall is a master of darkness. You grapple for light when you digest one of his paintings. That search gives them their urgency.
Hunter, by long occupation, is a basket maker who has gently tapped the sublime. I have seen examples of her work that were so demure and fragile that they touched my heart. Hall's paintings and Hunter's baskets -- fat bravura strokes versus the delicate intensity of a Swiss watchmaker -- would not relax in company with each other, friendship or not.
These were my thoughts when I first heard of the show at the June Fitzpatrick Gallery in Portland. My perceptions turned out to be wrong, largely because Hunter appeared as a draftsman-painter and not as an artisan. To jump from a craft in which she had achieved high recognition into the dangerous waters of drawing and painting was cause for speculation.
In any event, the jump was a secure one; Hunter, I have learned, trained as a painter before she began making baskets. Her compositions in this show, although independently achieved, have an attitude that is coincidental to that of Hall's. I think of Hall as elegiac. He reflects on the Shakers, on the old hills along the Saco River, on woodlands that have been clear-cut, on cornfields that have been harvested.
He maintains enough edge to prevent the images from sliding into melancholy; otherwise stated, he uses darkness to displace wistfulness. It is not a matter of balancing between light and darkness; his paintings are not nocturnes. Rather, through the agency of darkness, he comments on the elapse of events with considerable passion. His paintings can be quite remarkable.
Returning to Hunter, here she appears as a commentator on nature -- on stones, leaves, pods, birds and so on. The subjects invite a cordial embrace, but like Hall, she keeps her distance. Birds roosting as day ends merge into coagulated dark masses. Dark flowers have darker leaves in a mottled space. Leaves, stones and pods are offered in articulated muscular form. It is all consequential and, at least in suggestion, dark. The decorative opportunities provided by the subject matter are declined.
To sum things up, here are two intense artists with very little in common other than their individual intensities and inclinations toward darkness. Those ingredients are somehow sufficient. This is an extremely good show.